Ranked on lab data
Best tennis strings fordurability
You are snapping strings too often. Every one of 720 currently-produced strings carrying the measurements this ranking needs was scored against it — these are the 15 that came out on top, capped at two per brand so gauge variants of one string cannot fill the list.
- Snaps back more freely than 97% of the database
- Thicker than 96% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 97% of the database
- Thicker than 95% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 93% of the database
- Thicker than 99% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 96% of the database
- Thicker than 93% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 96% of the database
- Thicker than 93% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 99% of the database
- Thicker than 89% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 99% of the database
- Thicker than 89% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 91% of the database
- Thicker than 95% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 93% of the database
- Thicker than 93% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 93% of the database
- Thicker than 93% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 93% of the database
- Thicker than 93% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 96% of the database
- Thicker than 89% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 94% of the database
- Thicker than 89% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 97% of the database
- Thicker than 84% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 85% of the database
- Thicker than 93% of the database
The same ranking, without polyester
15 of the 15 above are polyester, which is an honest result and an unhelpful page — it wins this ranking outright and costs several times what anything else does. Ruled out before scoring rather than penalised during it, so the fit percentages below stay honest about what is left.
- Snaps back more freely than 72% of the database
- Thicker than 96% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 81% of the database
- Thicker than 98% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 74% of the database
- Thicker than 76% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 95% of the database
- Thicker than 68% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 74% of the database
- Thicker than 57% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 50% of the database
- Thicker than 84% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 89% of the database
- Thicker than 68% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 72% of the database
- Thicker than 84% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 56% of the database
- Thicker than 99% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 56% of the database
- Thicker than 98% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 64% of the database
- Thicker than 89% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 58% of the database
- Thicker than 93% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 61% of the database
- Thicker than 89% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 89% of the database
- Thicker than 57% of the database
- Snaps back more freely than 50% of the database
- Thicker than 98% of the database
What "durability" is actually ranked on
- Snapback ↓ lower decisive
- Diameter ↑ higher strong
- Material suited to this strong
The database publishes no durability figure, so this is scored on proxies: thickness, low string-on-string friction — sawing at the crossings is what actually severs a main — and material, because polyester genuinely outlasts nylon in a way these numbers cannot express.
This is the weakest ranking on the site — the database publishes no durability figure at all, so it is scored on proxies. Treat it as a shortlist, not a verdict.
Each string is scored on where it sits in the database on each measurement above, never on an absolute figure, so the ranking is always relative to what actually exists. How these numbers are made →
Make this specific to your racquet
This page ranks the database on the need alone. String pattern, head size and frame stiffness each move the answer, and a stiff frame removes the firmest quarter of the database outright rather than merely ranking it down — the finder applies all of that and shows you which picks changed as a result.
Ranked for something else
- More spin and shape Heavier topspin, more margin over the net
- Easier on my arm Elbow, wrist or shoulder soreness
- More control, less launch The ball is flying long on you
- More power and depth You are working too hard for pace
- Plays the same for longer It goes dead a week after stringing
- Best feel and touch Volleys, slice, drop shots, feedback