Weiss Cannon

MatchPower 1.25

Polyester 1.26 mm In production

Lab measurements for Weiss Cannon MatchPower 1.25, ranked against all 789 strings in the database. Every figure below is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension, not a playtest opinion.

Measured values

Stiffness

218lb/in

lower = softer, kinder on the arm

Tension loss

38%

lower = stays where you strung it

Energy return

87%

higher = livelier, more free power

Spin potential

3.6

higher = more spin off the string bed

Ball bite

0.389COF

higher = grabs the ball harder

Snapback

0.108COF

lower = strings slide and snap back

How it ranks against all 789 strings

Stiffness 218 lb/in · 86th pct

Stiffer than 86% of strings tested.

Tension loss 38 % · 65th pct

Sheds more tension than 65% of strings tested.

Energy return 87 % · 34th pct

Livelier than 34% of strings tested.

Spin potential 3.6 · 21st pct

More spin potential than 21% of strings tested.

Ball bite 0.389 COF · 17th pct

Grips the ball harder than 17% of strings tested.

Snapback 0.108 COF · 73rd pct

More string-on-string friction than 73% of strings tested.

Strings that play like this

Closest matches across stiffness, tension loss, energy return and spin potential.

More from Weiss Cannon

What these numbers mean

Stiffness · lb/in

How much the string bed resists deflection. Higher plays firmer and more controlled; lower plays softer and easier on the arm.

Tension loss · %

Share of the reference tension the string sheds under a fixed test protocol. Lower means the bed stays where you strung it for longer.

Energy return · %

Share of impact energy handed back to the ball. Higher plays livelier and more powerful.

Spin potential

Ball friction divided by string-on-string friction. Higher means better bite with a cleaner snapback, so more spin.

Ball bite · COF

String-on-ball friction. Higher grabs the ball harder through the brush.

Snapback · COF

String-on-string friction. Lower lets the mains slide and snap back into place after impact.

Compare MatchPower 1.25 against 789 strings Find the right string for me