Tecnifibre E-Matrix 17 vs Tecnifibre NRG2 18 (1.18)

Measured, side by side

Bars are percentile against all 791 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

• More spin and shape

  E-Matrix 17708th

  NRG2 18 (1.18)572nd

• Easier on my arm

  E-Matrix 1754th

  NRG2 18 (1.18)100th

• More control, less launch

  E-Matrix 17734th

  NRG2 18 (1.18)711th

• More power and depth

  E-Matrix 17130th

  NRG2 18 (1.18)128th

• Plays the same for longer

  E-Matrix 17126th

  NRG2 18 (1.18)144th

• Lasts longer before it breaks

  E-Matrix 17689th

  NRG2 18 (1.18)721st

• Best feel and touch

  E-Matrix 17101st

  NRG2 18 (1.18)112th

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Both strings in full

Add a third string E-Matrix 17 in full NRG2 18 (1.18) in full