Tecnifibre Black Code 4S 16 (1.30) vs Weiss Cannon Blue Rock N Power

Measured, side by side

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better — which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

• More spin and shape

  Black Code 4S 16 (1.30)9th

  Blue Rock N Power2nd

• Easier on my arm

  Black Code 4S 16 (1.30)663rd

  Blue Rock N Power614th

• More control, less launch

  Black Code 4S 16 (1.30)45th

  Blue Rock N Power88th

• More power and depth

  Black Code 4S 16 (1.30)462nd

  Blue Rock N Power468th

• Plays the same for longer

  Black Code 4S 16 (1.30)293rd

  Blue Rock N Power320th

• Lasts longer before it breaks

  Black Code 4S 16 (1.30)69th

  Blue Rock N Power114th

• Best feel and touch

  Black Code 4S 16 (1.30)460th

  Blue Rock N Power458th

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions — the calculator takes your own tension.

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed — these figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it — not when the string breaks.

Both strings in full

Add a third string Black Code 4S 16 (1.30) in full Blue Rock N Power in full