Head to head

Prince Vortex 16 (1.30) vs Solinco Revolution 17

Vortex 16 (1.30) leads on 4 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where Vortex 16 (1.30) is 22 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Prince

Vortex 16 (1.30)

Polyester · 16 ga

Solinco

Revolution 17

Polyester · 17 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
18855th pct
18956th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
5996th pct
5088th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
814th pct
8311th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
8.096th pct
6.687th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.54990th pct
0.47668th pct
Snapback lower = strings slide and snap back
0.0694th pct
0.0727th pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better — which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions — the calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Vortex 16 (1.30) at 52 lb

String Revolution 17 at 51.8 lb 23.5 kg

Coming from Revolution 17 at 52 lb

String Vortex 16 (1.30) at 52.2 lb 23.7 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed — these figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Vortex 16 (1.30) mains / Revolution 17 crosses

Stiffness55th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss95th pct · 1 measured
Energy return6th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential96th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite88th pct · 1 measured
Snapback4th pct · 1 measured

Revolution 17 mains / Vortex 16 (1.30) crosses

Stiffness55th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss93rd pct · 1 measured
Energy return7th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential89th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite72nd pct · 1 measured
Snapback6th pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it — not when the string breaks.

Vortex 16 (1.30)

~11 hours of play

Revolution 17

~14 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugeStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFSnap COF
Prince Vortex 16 (1.30) Polyester1618859818.00.5490.069
Solinco Revolution 17 Polyester1718950836.60.4760.072

Add a third string Vortex 16 (1.30) in full Revolution 17 in full