Head to head

Prince Tour XC 15L vs Prince Tour XR 16 (1.30)

Tour XR 16 (1.30) leads on 3 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where Tour XR 16 (1.30) is 26 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Prince

Tour XC 15L

Polyester · 15L ga

Prince

Tour XR 16 (1.30)

Polyester · 16 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
20977th pct
21583rd pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
4578th pct
4168th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
8523rd pct
8524th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
5.569th pct
5.569th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.41634th pct
0.45860th pct
String friction lower = strings slide and snap back
0.07513th pct
0.08432nd pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Tour XC 15L at 52 lb

String Tour XR 16 (1.30) at 50.5 lb 22.9 kg

Coming from Tour XR 16 (1.30) at 52 lb

String Tour XC 15L at 53.6 lb 24.3 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Tour XC 15L mains / Tour XR 16 (1.30) crosses

Stiffness80th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss74th pct · 1 measured
Energy return23rd pct · 1 measured
Spin potential69th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite39th pct · 1 measured
String friction18th pct · 1 measured

Tour XR 16 (1.30) mains / Tour XC 15L crosses

Stiffness81st pct · 1 measured
Tension loss71st pct · 1 measured
Energy return23rd pct · 1 measured
Spin potential69th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite57th pct · 1 measured
String friction27th pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Tour XC 15L

~17 hours of play

Tour XR 16 (1.30)

~19 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugePriceStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFFriction COF
Prince Tour XC 15L Polyester15Lfind20945855.50.4160.075
Prince Tour XR 16 (1.30) Polyester16find21541855.50.4580.084

Add a third string Tour XC 15L in full Tour XR 16 (1.30) in full