Head to head

Pacific Tough Gut 16 vs Tecnifibre E-Matrix 16

E-Matrix 16 leads on 4 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where E-Matrix 16 is 14 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Pacific

Tough Gut 16

Gut · 16 ga

Tecnifibre

E-Matrix 16

Nylon/Polyurethane · 16 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
1072nd pct
1437th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
2119th pct
2019th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
9596th pct
9493rd pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
1.81st pct
2.76th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.3200th pct
0.38415th pct
String friction lower = strings slide and snap back
0.18097th pct
0.14291st pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Tough Gut 16 at 52 lb

String E-Matrix 16 at 38.8 lb 17.6 kg

Coming from E-Matrix 16 at 52 lb

String Tough Gut 16 at 69.8 lb 31.7 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Tough Gut 16 mains / E-Matrix 16 crosses

Stiffness3rd pct · 1 measured
Tension loss19th pct · 1 measured
Energy return95th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential2nd pct · 1 measured
Ball bite1st pct · 1 measured
String friction96th pct · 1 measured

E-Matrix 16 mains / Tough Gut 16 crosses

Stiffness4th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss19th pct · 1 measured
Energy return95th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential4th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite10th pct · 1 measured
String friction94th pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Tough Gut 16

~34 hours of play

E-Matrix 16

~34 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugePriceStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFFriction COF
Pacific Tough Gut 16 Gut16find10721951.80.3200.180
Tecnifibre E-Matrix 16 Nylon/Polyurethane16find14320942.70.3840.142

Add a third string Tough Gut 16 in full E-Matrix 16 in full