Pacific Power Twist 16L vs Volkl Power-Fiber II 18

Measured, side by side

Bars are percentile against all 791 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

• More spin and shape

  Power Twist 16L623rd

  Power-Fiber II 18669th

• Easier on my arm

  Power Twist 16L166th

  Power-Fiber II 18147th

• More control, less launch

  Power Twist 16L664th

  Power-Fiber II 18693rd

• More power and depth

  Power Twist 16L122nd

  Power-Fiber II 18101st

• Plays the same for longer

  Power Twist 16L207th

  Power-Fiber II 18208th

• Lasts longer before it breaks

  Power Twist 16L558th

  Power-Fiber II 18719th

• Best feel and touch

  Power Twist 16L139th

  Power-Fiber II 18116th

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Both strings in full

Add a third string Power Twist 16L in full Power-Fiber II 18 in full