Head to head

Luxilon Element 1.30 vs Wilson Revolve 15 (1.35)

Element 1.30 leads on 5 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where Element 1.30 is 17 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Luxilon

Element 1.30

Polyester

Wilson

Revolve 15 (1.35)

Polyester · 15 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
19259th pct
19259th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
4475th pct
4270th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
8733rd pct
8631st pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
6.687th pct
6.181st pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.44653rd pct
0.41836th pct
Snapback lower = strings slide and snap back
0.0683rd pct
0.0694th pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better — which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions — the calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Element 1.30 at 52 lb

String Revolve 15 (1.35) at 51.9 lb 23.5 kg

Coming from Revolve 15 (1.35) at 52 lb

String Element 1.30 at 52.1 lb 23.6 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed — these figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Element 1.30 mains / Revolve 15 (1.35) crosses

Stiffness59th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss73rd pct · 1 measured
Energy return32nd pct · 1 measured
Spin potential86th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite51st pct · 1 measured
Snapback3rd pct · 1 measured

Revolve 15 (1.35) mains / Element 1.30 crosses

Stiffness59th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss71st pct · 1 measured
Energy return32nd pct · 1 measured
Spin potential82nd pct · 1 measured
Ball bite39th pct · 1 measured
Snapback3rd pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it — not when the string breaks.

Element 1.30

~18 hours of play

Revolve 15 (1.35)

~19 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugeStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFSnap COF
Luxilon Element 1.30 Polyester19244876.60.4460.068
Wilson Revolve 15 (1.35) Polyester1519242866.10.4180.069

Add a third string Element 1.30 in full Revolve 15 (1.35) in full