Leopard Plus Control 16 vs Tecnifibre Polyspin 16L

Measured, side by side

Bars are percentile against all 791 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

• More spin and shape

  Plus Control 16554th

  Polyspin 16L566th

• Easier on my arm

  Plus Control 16763rd

  Polyspin 16L751st

• More control, less launch

  Plus Control 1650th

  Polyspin 16L66th

• More power and depth

  Plus Control 16753rd

  Polyspin 16L737th

• Plays the same for longer

  Plus Control 16540th

  Polyspin 16L501st

• Lasts longer before it breaks

  Plus Control 16235th

  Polyspin 16L358th

• Best feel and touch

  Plus Control 16745th

  Polyspin 16L728th

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Both strings in full

Add a third string Plus Control 16 in full Polyspin 16L in full