Head to head

Kirschbaum Super Smash 16/1.30 vs Kirschbaum Touch Turbo 1.30

Touch Turbo 1.30 leads on 4 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where Touch Turbo 1.30 is 15 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Kirschbaum

Super Smash 16/1.30

Polyester · 16 ga

Kirschbaum

Touch Turbo 1.30

Polyester

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
22289th pct
21886th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
5189th pct
4678th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
814th pct
838th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
5.365th pct
5.365th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.42440th pct
0.45056th pct
Snapback lower = strings slide and snap back
0.08023rd pct
0.08534th pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better — which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions — the calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Super Smash 16/1.30 at 52 lb

String Touch Turbo 1.30 at 54.8 lb 24.9 kg

Coming from Touch Turbo 1.30 at 52 lb

String Super Smash 16/1.30 at 49.9 lb 22.6 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed — these figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Super Smash 16/1.30 mains / Touch Turbo 1.30 crosses

Stiffness88th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss87th pct · 1 measured
Energy return6th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential65th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite42nd pct · 1 measured
Snapback27th pct · 1 measured

Touch Turbo 1.30 mains / Super Smash 16/1.30 crosses

Stiffness88th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss83rd pct · 1 measured
Energy return7th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential65th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite54th pct · 1 measured
Snapback31st pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it — not when the string breaks.

Super Smash 16/1.30

~13 hours of play

Touch Turbo 1.30

~17 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugeStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFSnap COF
Kirschbaum Super Smash 16/1.30 Polyester1622251815.30.4240.080
Kirschbaum Touch Turbo 1.30 Polyester21846835.30.4500.085

Add a third string Super Smash 16/1.30 in full Touch Turbo 1.30 in full