Head to head

Kirschbaum Pro Line X 17 (1.25) vs Wilson Enduro Pro 16

Pro Line X 17 (1.25) leads on 4 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where Pro Line X 17 (1.25) is 14 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Kirschbaum

Pro Line X 17 (1.25)

Polyester · 17 ga

Wilson

Enduro Pro 16

Polyester · 16 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
21886th pct
22087th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
3763rd pct
3661st pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
8735th pct
8734th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
4.851st pct
4.748th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.42339th pct
0.40326th pct
String friction lower = strings slide and snap back
0.08944th pct
0.08637th pct

Bars are percentile against all 791 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Pro Line X 17 (1.25) at 52 lb

String Enduro Pro 16 at 51.7 lb 23.5 kg

Coming from Enduro Pro 16 at 52 lb

String Pro Line X 17 (1.25) at 52.3 lb 23.7 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Pro Line X 17 (1.25) mains / Enduro Pro 16 crosses

Stiffness87th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss62nd pct · 1 measured
Energy return35th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential49th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite37th pct · 1 measured
String friction43rd pct · 1 measured

Enduro Pro 16 mains / Pro Line X 17 (1.25) crosses

Stiffness87th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss62nd pct · 1 measured
Energy return35th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential49th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite27th pct · 1 measured
String friction38th pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Pro Line X 17 (1.25)

~21 hours of play

Enduro Pro 16

~22 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugePriceStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFFriction COF
Kirschbaum Pro Line X 17 (1.25) Polyester17find21837874.80.4230.089
Wilson Enduro Pro 16 Polyester16find22036874.70.4030.086

Add a third string Pro Line X 17 (1.25) in full Enduro Pro 16 in full