IsoSpeed Energetic 17 vs Wilson Shock Shield 16

Measured, side by side

Bars are percentile against all 791 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

• More spin and shape

  Energetic 17691st

  Shock Shield 16686th

• Easier on my arm

  Energetic 17232nd

  Shock Shield 16218th

• More control, less launch

  Energetic 17620th

  Shock Shield 16633rd

• More power and depth

  Energetic 17267th

  Shock Shield 16253rd

• Plays the same for longer

  Energetic 17431st

  Shock Shield 16394th

• Lasts longer before it breaks

  Energetic 17701st

  Shock Shield 16627th

• Best feel and touch

  Energetic 17283rd

  Shock Shield 16268th

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Both strings in full

Add a third string Energetic 17 in full Shock Shield 16 in full