StringSpec
String finder

Browse all 791

Head to head

IsoSpeed Axon Multi 16L vs IsoSpeed Control Classic 16

Axon Multi 16L leads on 5 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where Axon Multi 16L is 30 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

IsoSpeed

Axon Multi 16L

Nylon/Polyolefin · 16L ga

IsoSpeed

Control Classic 16

Polyolefin · 16 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
1263rd pct
1364th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
2946th pct
3252nd pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
9168th pct
9168th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
3.09th pct
2.33rd pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.43246th pct
0.38616th pct
String friction lower = strings slide and snap back
0.14692nd pct
0.17096th pct

Bars are percentile against all 791 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Axon Multi 16L at 52 lb

String Control Classic 16 at 30.0 lb 13.6 kg

Clamped. The proportional answer was -744,121,981,888,052.4 lb, outside what most frames are rated for. These two are too far apart in stiffness to match by tension alone.

Coming from Control Classic 16 at 52 lb

String Axon Multi 16L at 60.2 lb 27.3 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Axon Multi 16L mains / Control Classic 16 crosses

Stiffness4th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss48th pct · 1 measured
Energy return68th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential8th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite42nd pct · 1 measured
String friction94th pct · 1 measured

Control Classic 16 mains / Axon Multi 16L crosses

Stiffness4th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss50th pct · 1 measured
Energy return68th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential4th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite19th pct · 1 measured
String friction95th pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Axon Multi 16L

~26 hours of play

Control Classic 16

~24 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugePriceStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFFriction COF
IsoSpeed Axon Multi 16L Nylon/Polyolefin16Lfind12629913.00.4320.146
IsoSpeed Control Classic 16 Polyolefin16find13632912.30.3860.170

Add a third string Axon Multi 16L in full Control Classic 16 in full