Gamma Zo Ice 16 vs Leopard Plus Control 16

Measured, side by side

Bars are percentile against all 791 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

• More spin and shape

  Zo Ice 16464th

  Plus Control 16554th

• Easier on my arm

  Zo Ice 16747th

  Plus Control 16763rd

• More control, less launch

  Zo Ice 1657th

  Plus Control 1650th

• More power and depth

  Zo Ice 16742nd

  Plus Control 16753rd

• Plays the same for longer

  Zo Ice 16519th

  Plus Control 16540th

• Lasts longer before it breaks

  Zo Ice 16409th

  Plus Control 16235th

• Best feel and touch

  Zo Ice 16733rd

  Plus Control 16745th

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Both strings in full

Add a third string Zo Ice 16 in full Plus Control 16 in full