Head to head

Gamma Glide Cross String 16 vs Prince Premier W/ Softflex 17

Glide Cross String 16 leads on 2 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where Premier W/ Softflex 17 is 42 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Gamma

Glide Cross String 16

Nylon · 16 ga

Prince

Premier W/ Softflex 17

Nylon · 17 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
1334th pct
15114th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
2328th pct
2328th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
9598th pct
9598th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
3.213th pct
3.213th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.3636th pct
0.43548th pct
Snapback lower = strings slide and snap back
0.11580th pct
0.13589th pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better — which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions — the calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Glide Cross String 16 at 52 lb

String Premier W/ Softflex 17 at 43.9 lb 19.9 kg

Coming from Premier W/ Softflex 17 at 52 lb

String Glide Cross String 16 at 62.3 lb 28.3 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed — these figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Glide Cross String 16 mains / Premier W/ Softflex 17 crosses

Stiffness6th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss28th pct · 1 measured
Energy return98th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential13th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite9th pct · 1 measured
Snapback83rd pct · 1 measured

Premier W/ Softflex 17 mains / Glide Cross String 16 crosses

Stiffness7th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss28th pct · 1 measured
Energy return98th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential13th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite41st pct · 1 measured
Snapback87th pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it — not when the string breaks.

Glide Cross String 16

~32 hours of play

Premier W/ Softflex 17

~32 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugeStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFSnap COF
Gamma Glide Cross String 16 Nylon1613323953.20.3630.115
Prince Premier W/ Softflex 17 Nylon1715123953.20.4350.135

Add a third string Glide Cross String 16 in full Premier W/ Softflex 17 in full