StringSpec
String finder

Browse all 788

Head to head

Double AR Twice Dragon(1.30) vs Volkl Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30)

Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) leads on 4 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is ball bite, where Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) is 14 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Double AR

Twice Dragon(1.30)

Polyester

Volkl

Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30)

Polyester · 16 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
17139th pct
16736th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
5190th pct
5292nd pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
8310th pct
8310th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
7.292nd pct
8.798th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.51081st pct
0.59295th pct
String friction lower = strings slide and snap back
0.0716th pct
0.0683rd pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Twice Dragon(1.30) at 52 lb

String Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) at 53.1 lb 24.1 kg

Coming from Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) at 52 lb

String Twice Dragon(1.30) at 50.9 lb 23.1 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Twice Dragon(1.30) mains / Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) crosses

Stiffness38th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss91st pct · 1 measured
Energy return10th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential95th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite85th pct · 1 measured
String friction5th pct · 1 measured

Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) mains / Twice Dragon(1.30) crosses

Stiffness37th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss91st pct · 1 measured
Energy return10th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential97th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite94th pct · 1 measured
String friction3rd pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Twice Dragon(1.30)

~13 hours of play

Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30)

~12 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugePriceStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFFriction COF
Double AR Twice Dragon(1.30) Polyester—find17151837.20.5100.071
Volkl Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) Polyester16find16752838.70.5920.068

Add a third string Twice Dragon(1.30) in full Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) in full