Babolat Attraction 16 vs IsoSpeed Energetic Plus 16

Measured, side by side

Bars are percentile against all 791 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

• More spin and shape

  Attraction 16681st

  Energetic Plus 16680th

• Easier on my arm

  Attraction 16183rd

  Energetic Plus 16173rd

• More control, less launch

  Attraction 16602nd

  Energetic Plus 16640th

• More power and depth

  Attraction 16264th

  Energetic Plus 16247th

• Plays the same for longer

  Attraction 16166th

  Energetic Plus 16236th

• Lasts longer before it breaks

  Attraction 16605th

  Energetic Plus 16586th

• Best feel and touch

  Attraction 16240th

  Energetic Plus 16235th

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Both strings in full

Add a third string Attraction 16 in full Energetic Plus 16 in full