Hybrid builder

Two strings,one string bed.

The mains carry most of the load, take most of the deflection and are the only strings that snap back. A hybrid is not the average of its two strings, and which one you put in the mains changes the answer more than which two you picked. Pick both and see where the bed lands.

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

1 Your mains (the vertical strings)

These do most of the work. Usually the stiffer, more durable string, a polyester for most people who hybrid.

2 Your crosses (the horizontal strings)

These soften the bed and let the mains move. Usually gut or a multifilament.

Start over

Quasi-Gut Armor 16 mains / Xcel French Open Black 16 crosses

Tourna Quasi-Gut Armor 16 (Nylon/Polyester) in the mains, Babolat Xcel French Open Black 16 (Nylon) in the crosses. Every figure below is estimated from the two strings' own lab measurements.

Where the bed lands

Stiffness13th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss2nd pct · 1 measured
Energy return92nd pct · 1 measured
Spin potential55th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite84th pct · 1 measured
Snapback68th pct · 1 measured

Percentile against all 788 measured strings, as if this bed were one of them.

The bed against its own two halves

A hybrid is only worth the extra work if it lands somewhere neither string reaches on its own. This is where you find out whether yours does.

Measurement Quasi-Gut Armor 16 alone This hybrid Xcel French Open Black 16 alone
Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm 153 150 145
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it 13 13 13
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power 93 94 95
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed 4.9 5.0 5.2
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder 0.526 0.519 0.481
Snapback lower = strings slide and snap back 0.107 0.103 0.092

What the crosses change

Against a full bed of Quasi-Gut Armor 16. Moves are in percentile points, and "better" always means more of the good thing whichever way the raw number points.

  • Energy return +5 pts 93 → 94 % mains weighted 60%
  • Snapback +4 pts 0.107 → 0.103 COF mains weighted 75%

The other way round

Xcel French Open Black 16 in the mains and Quasi-Gut Armor 16 in the crosses is a different bed, not the same one described differently. Worth a look before you commit.

Stiffness11th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss2nd pct · 1 measured
Energy return94th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential61st pct · 1 measured
Ball bite73rd pct · 1 measured
Snapback56th pct · 1 measured

Swap them round Compare the two strings head to head

How this is worked out

Each measurement is a weighted average of the two strings, with the mains carrying the larger share. The share is not the same for every metric: bed stiffness is close to 60/40 because the crosses genuinely soften the bed, but spin is nearer 80/20 because snapback is a mains phenomenon and the crosses barely participate in it.

These splits are the conventional stringer figures, not measurements. Nobody has put a hybrid bed on the machine and published the result, so this cannot be validated against anything. Treat it as a guide to which direction a pairing moves, and never as lab data. The full methodology →