StringSpec
String finder

Browse all 788

Head to head

Luxilon Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L vs Luxilon Savage 16/1.27

Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L leads on 4 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is energy return, where Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L is 16 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Luxilon

Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L

Polyester · 16L ga

Luxilon

Savage 16/1.27

Polyester · 16 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
23395th pct
23496th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
4474th pct
4680th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
8631st pct
8415th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
3.314th pct
3.416th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.37711th pct
0.39923rd pct
String friction lower = strings slide and snap back
0.11680th pct
0.11781st pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L at 52 lb

String Savage 16/1.27 at 51.2 lb 23.2 kg

Coming from Savage 16/1.27 at 52 lb

String Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L at 52.9 lb 24.0 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L mains / Savage 16/1.27 crosses

Stiffness95th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss76th pct · 1 measured
Energy return24th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential15th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite13th pct · 1 measured
String friction81st pct · 1 measured

Savage 16/1.27 mains / Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L crosses

Stiffness96th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss78th pct · 1 measured
Energy return22nd pct · 1 measured
Spin potential15th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite21st pct · 1 measured
String friction81st pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L

~18 hours of play

Savage 16/1.27

~16 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugePriceStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFFriction COF
Luxilon Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L Polyester16Lfind23344863.30.3770.116
Luxilon Savage 16/1.27 Polyester16find23446843.40.3990.117

Add a third string Monotec Super Poly 1.25/16L in full Savage 16/1.27 in full