Head to head

Kirschbaum Pro Line I 1.30 vs Weiss Cannon Scorpion 1.33

They split the measurements 2–2. The widest gap is string friction, where Pro Line I 1.30 is 20 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Kirschbaum

Pro Line I 1.30

Polyester

Weiss Cannon

Scorpion 1.33

Polyester

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
22591st pct
22390th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
4884th pct
4884th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
8415th pct
8415th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
4.440th pct
4.235th pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.3584th pct
0.37510th pct
String friction lower = strings slide and snap back
0.08126th pct
0.09046th pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Pro Line I 1.30 at 52 lb

String Scorpion 1.33 at 53.7 lb 24.4 kg

Coming from Scorpion 1.33 at 52 lb

String Pro Line I 1.30 at 50.2 lb 22.8 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Pro Line I 1.30 mains / Scorpion 1.33 crosses

Stiffness90th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss84th pct · 1 measured
Energy return15th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential38th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite5th pct · 1 measured
String friction31st pct · 1 measured

Scorpion 1.33 mains / Pro Line I 1.30 crosses

Stiffness90th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss84th pct · 1 measured
Energy return15th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential36th pct · 1 measured
Ball bite9th pct · 1 measured
String friction41st pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Pro Line I 1.30

~15 hours of play

Scorpion 1.33

~15 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugePriceStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFFriction COF
Kirschbaum Pro Line I 1.30 Polyesterfind22548844.40.3580.081
Weiss Cannon Scorpion 1.33 Polyesterfind22348844.20.3750.090

Add a third string Pro Line I 1.30 in full Scorpion 1.33 in full