Head to head

Gosen Compositemaster II 16 vs Gosen Nanosilver 17

Nanosilver 17 leads on 3 of 6 measurements. The widest gap is string friction, where Compositemaster II 16 is 21 percentile points ahead. Every figure is a testing-machine result at a fixed reference tension.

Measured, side by side

Gosen

Compositemaster II 16

Nylon · 16 ga

Gosen

Nanosilver 17

Nylon · 17 ga

Stiffness lower = softer, kinder on the arm
15114th pct
15720th pct
Tension loss lower = stays where you strung it
2431st pct
2225th pct
Energy return higher = livelier, more free power
9386th pct
9598th pct
Spin potential higher = more spin off the string bed
4.543rd pct
4.543rd pct
Ball bite higher = grabs the ball harder
0.3523rd pct
0.39822nd pct
String friction lower = strings slide and snap back
0.07921st pct
0.08842nd pct

Bars are percentile against all 788 strings, and the marked side is the one that measures better, which is not always the one you want. A firmer bed is worse for your elbow and better for your control, and no measurement knows which of those you came for.

Which one wins, by problem

Each string's standing on the site's rankings, out of every measured string in the database. This is where a comparison stops being arithmetic and starts being a decision.

Swapping between them: what tension?

Bed stiffness is published at one reference tension, so the only honest conversion is to scale it. These are starting points from 52 lb, not prescriptions. The calculator takes your own tension.

Coming from Compositemaster II 16 at 52 lb

String Nanosilver 17 at 47.1 lb 21.4 kg

Coming from Nanosilver 17 at 52 lb

String Compositemaster II 16 at 56.5 lb 25.6 kg

Hybrid: what if you used both?

Estimated, not measured. No hybrid combination has been tested as a bed. These figures are the two strings' own lab measurements weighted by how much of the bed each one actually is. Treat them as a guide to which way a pairing moves, never as lab data.

Compositemaster II 16 mains / Nanosilver 17 crosses

Stiffness15th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss29th pct · 1 measured
Energy return94th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential43rd pct · 1 measured
Ball bite4th pct · 1 measured
String friction27th pct · 1 measured

Nanosilver 17 mains / Compositemaster II 16 crosses

Stiffness17th pct · 1 measured
Tension loss27th pct · 1 measured
Energy return95th pct · 1 measured
Spin potential43rd pct · 1 measured
Ball bite18th pct · 1 measured
String friction35th pct · 1 measured

Open this in the hybrid builder

Which goes dead first?

Estimated from tension loss, which is the only thing the database measures about ageing. This is when the bed stops playing the way you strung it, not when the string breaks.

Compositemaster II 16

~31 hours of play

Nanosilver 17

~33 hours of play

Both strings in full

Every published measurement
StringGaugePriceStiff lb/inLoss %Power %SpinBite COFFriction COF
Gosen Compositemaster II 16 Nylon16find15124934.50.3520.079
Gosen Nanosilver 17 Nylon17find15722954.50.3980.088

Add a third string Compositemaster II 16 in full Nanosilver 17 in full